cell phones,china cell phone,wholesale cell phone,HiPhone, google phone,mobile handset,china mobile
RSS icon Email icon Home icon
  • Motorola is Goto Android Market?

    Posted on September 11th, 2009 admin 1 comment

    Motorola has finally announced its bet-the-company Android handset. At GigaOM’s Mobilize 09 event in San Francisco this morning, Sanjay Jha, Motorola’s co-CEO and CEO of the company’s handset division, uncrated the CLIQ, a device it describes unremarkably as the “first phone with social skills.”

    Why? Well, the CLIQ, or DEXT as it will be confusingly branded in the U.K., incorporates Motorola’s new “MotoBlur” service, which essentially corrals Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Picasa, GMail and MS Exchange activity into a single feed and presents them on your phone.

    In form, the CLIQ is a sideways slider. Like the Palm (PALM) Pre, the device boasts a full touchscreen and QWERTY keyboard. It’s got a 320 x 480-pixel, 3.1-inch HVGA screen and a five-megapixel camera. The CLIQ is video-capable (play, stream and capture) and supports the broad spectrum of media formats. It runs Android 1.5 (Cupcake), and Motorola (MOT) claims a battery life of six hours.

    Jha says the phone is not intended to be a single iconic device–like, say, Apple’s (AAPL) iPhone. Rather, it is the first of a broad line of handsets, all running Android and Motoblur, that will be targeted at different customer segments around the world.

    A wise strategy in the current market? Who knows? But at least it’s a step in the right direction. Motorola clearly needs to do something to right itself after the past few disastrous years. Hard to believe the company controlled 16.1 percent of the global handset market just two years ago. It’s market share today? A modest 6.5 percent. The CLIQ will be sold through T-Mobile in the United States.

    The device’s spec sheet below; click to enlarge.

  • As PCs, cell phones converge, Intel finds new rival

    Posted on August 21st, 2009 admin 1 comment

    SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) - As the market for personal computers has matured, Intel Corp. has moved into new battlegrounds for portable devices - bringing the semiconductor giant a roster of new rivals.

    One of the main ones is ARM Holdings, a lesser known British technology company with a strong track record of designing low-cost, low-power chips for mobile phones.

    The companies are likely to collide in a new market for portable computing devices that fall between laptop computers - a market Intel /quotes/comstock/15*!intc/quotes/nls/intc (INTC 18.71, -0.07, -0.37%) currently rules - and cell phones, which is ARM’s key market. Intel already has a strong foothold in this market with its Atom chip, which powers so-called netbooks. But a rush is on to develop new devices that can offer consumers the full computing power of PCs and the portability of a wireless phone.

    “We have this hybrid market literally riding the line between the two,” analyst Dean McCarron of Mercury Research said in an interview. “All the ingredients for the collision are there.”

    ARM /quotes/comstock/15*!armh/quotes/nls/armh (ARMH 6.25, +0.06, +0.97%) technology is used in millions of cell phones and other products made by companies, such as Samsung /quotes/comstock/11i!ssngy (SSNG.Y 185.67, +0.53, +0.29%) , Nokia /quotes/comstock/13*!nok/quotes/nls/nok (NOK 12.25, -0.10, -0.81%) and Palm /quotes/comstock/15*!palm/quotes/nls/palm (PALM 13.51, -0.03, -0.22%) .

    On the other hand, Intel’s chips power the world’s most popular PCs made by such companies as Hewlett-Packard /quotes/comstock/13*!hpq/quotes/nls/hpq (HPQ 43.98, +0.15, +0.34%) and Dell Inc. /quotes/comstock/15*!dell/quotes/nls/dell (DELL 14.55, +0.10, +0.69%)

    Intel and its allies have been pushing the netbook, the stripped down version of a notebook, and so-called MIDS, or mobile internet devices. Meanwhile, the wireless market has been moving toward smart phones such as the iPhone, BlackBerry and Palm Pre that offer Web surfing and email capabilities.

    Power vs. consumption

    It’s a collision where two factors could prove critical: A processor’s computing capability, and its appetite for electrical power. Intel is widely expected to have a huge advantage in performance, while ARM is seen as having the edge in power efficiency.

    Bob Morris, ARM’s director of mobile computing, portrays Intel as being in a desperate position, saying the chipmaker has no choice but take on the new market because it now finds itself boxed in in the maturing PC market.

    “Intel has to go after this market, as the PC market is not growing,” he said in an e-mail. “The growth market moving forward will be the mobile device market. We are closely approaching the point (if we are not there already) where people accessing the Internet from a mobile device will exceed those accessing it from a PC.”

    Intel Spokesman Tom Beerman disputed that view, saying the company is moving into the new market because of opportunities in the changing cell phone market.

    “Cell phones are becoming more PC-like,” he said. “There are more and more requirements for that device to be more PC-like. Our view is that Intel is very well suited to provide that technology.”

    Not a household name

    Despite the ubiquity of its technology, ARM, which is based in Cambridge, UK, is not a household name, like the Silicon Valley behemoth made famous by its slogan, “Intel Inside.”

    “They’re very invisible,” Global Equities Research analyst Trip Chowdhry said in an interview. “You don’t see devices saying ‘ARM Inside,’ or ‘Powered by ARM.’ I don’t think they have the mass consumer awareness like Intel.”

  • Driving, cell phones a dangerous combo

    Posted on June 6th, 2009 admin No comments

    An estimated 2,600 people die in accidents each year because of drivers using cell phones. Non-fatal accidents involving cell phones aren’t tracked. The state Department of Transportation database form to catalogue crashes doesn’t have a check box for “cell phone.” DOT hasn’t updated its database since 1994 because it would cost money the department doesn’t have.

    Connecticut was one of the first to ban hand-held cell phones. The fine is $100. Tickets issued jumped from 17,755 in 2006 to 38,336 in 2007. Ticket revenue climbed, too, from $763,674 in 2006, to $1,950,645 in 2007, and $2,489,215 in 2008. With revenue like that, it’s hard to understand why DOT is too poor to update the database. If all accidents caused by drivers using cell phones were tallied, we’d see just how dangerous the practice is.

    The major problem is police don’t seem very interested in arresting offenders, dozens of whom drive by me every day. If this law were enforced, the state wouldn’t have a deficit. If the fine were doubled, the state would have a surplus — and we would all be safer on the road.

    Sealong Duan
    The CellphonexBox Team